Heavy metal contamination represents one of the most persistent global environmental health challenges, affecting human, animal, and ecosystem health worldwide [1]. For decades, scientists have documented the toxic effects of metals, including lead, cadmium, mercury, arsenic, chromium, and others, yet a comprehensive mechanistic understanding of how these exposures translate into disease remained fragmented across disparate fields. The historical challenge has not been a lack of evidence that heavy metals are harmful, but rather the absence of a unified framework connecting environmental exposure to pathogenic response at the molecular level. Heavy metals enter biological systems through multiple pathways— inhalation, ingestion, and dermal contact—leading to bioaccumulation and biomagnification in food chains [2]. Their persistence in the environment, combined with their non-biodegradable nature, ensures continuous human and animal exposure.
The toxicity mechanisms of individual metals have been studied extensively, with lead substituting for calcium in bone and nervous tissue, cadmium displacing zinc from critical proteins, mercury binding to sulfhydryl groups, and arsenic generating reactive oxygen species [3]. However, these individual toxicological profiles failed to explain a critical phenomenon: why certain bacterial pathogens thrived in heavy-metal-contaminated environments and why the most virulent infections seemed to emerge from metal-polluted ecological niches. This gap in understanding represents the fundamental problem that microbial metallomics now addresses.
Metallomics as an Emerging Discipline: From Concept to Application
Metallomics emerged as a formal scientific discipline in 2002, integrating metallurgy, biochemistry, genomics, and environmental science [4]. This field studies the metallome—the complete set of metal ions and their interactions with biological molecules, including proteins, metabolites, and genetic material. Unlike traditional toxicology, which focuses on individual metal species and their effects, metallomics examines the dynamic, integrated networks through which organisms acquire, transport, store, and utilize metals [5]. The field employs advanced analytical techniques, including inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) and complementary proteomic approaches, to identify which proteins bind specific metals and how metal bioavailability changes across biological compartments.
For microbial systems, metallomics has revealed that bacteria possess sophisticated metal homeostasis mechanisms involving multiple transporters, storage proteins, and regulatory systems [6]. These mechanisms are not merely defensive; they are fundamentally linked to virulence expression. The human body, contrary to earlier assumptions, does not provide unlimited access to essential metals—it actively restricts metal availability as a defense mechanism. Yet pathogenic bacteria have evolved elegant strategies to overcome this host restriction, making metal acquisition systems virulence factors in their own right. Understanding the complete metallome of pathogenic organisms is therefore not an academic exercise but essential for identifying new therapeutic targets.
Bioinorganic Chemistry: The Structural Basis of Metal-Dependent Pathogenesis
Bioinorganic chemistry provides the fundamental principles underlying how metal ions coordinate with amino acid ligands to form functional enzyme active sites [7]. Metal ions are not passive cofactors; their chemical properties—including oxidation state, ionic radius, and preferred coordination geometry—directly determine which amino acids will bind them and what reactions those enzymes can catalyze. This specificity is remarkable: nickel-dependent enzymes use histidine and cysteine ligands in precise geometric arrangements, while manganese-dependent enzymes often employ different coordination spheres. The coordination environment of a metal ion dramatically affects enzyme catalytic efficiency, substrate specificity, and product formation.
The coordination chemistry perspective also illuminates why heavy metal toxicity occurs. When a non-cognate metal enters a cell—such as cadmium entering a zinc-binding site—the altered coordination geometry and redox properties produce non-functional or dysfunctional proteins [8]. Furthermore, the Fenton reaction, whereby iron catalyzes the conversion of hydrogen peroxide into highly reactive hydroxyl radicals, demonstrates how metal chemistry directly generates the oxidative stress characteristic of heavy metal toxicity. This mechanistic understanding marks the transition from observational toxicology to predictive, chemistry-based pathology: we can now predict, based on coordination-chemistry principles, which proteins will be affected by which metal displacements.
Comparative Toxicity of Priority Heavy Metals: Aluminum, Nickel, Manganese, Chromium, Arsenic, Tin, Cadmium, Mercury, and Lead
The toxicological landscape of heavy metals encompasses metals with diverse chemical properties and biological effects [9]. Aluminum, increasingly recognized as a neurotoxic contaminant, crosses the blood-brain barrier and disrupts phosphate metabolism and neurotransmitter synthesis [1]. Nickel, occupying a peculiar position as both essential for bacterial pathogens and potentially hazardous to humans, interferes with iron absorption and generates oxidative stress at physiologically relevant concentrations [10]. Manganese, while essential in low concentrations, becomes neurotoxic at elevated exposure levels, particularly affecting the basal ganglia and producing a Parkinson-like syndrome [11].
Hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) acts as a potent carcinogen and mutagen, readily crossing cell membranes where it is reduced to Cr(III), generating reactive intermediates in the process [12]. Inorganic arsenic binds to critical sulfhydryl groups in proteins, disrupting enzyme function and triggering severe oxidative stress and DNA damage [13]. Organic and inorganic tin compounds affect immune function and endocrine signaling, with organic forms (tributyltin) being particularly neurotoxic. Cadmium, one of the most cumulative toxic metals, binds to metallothioneins and accumulates in kidneys and liver, disrupting calcium signaling and inducing apoptosis [14]. Mercury, existing in multiple chemical forms (elemental, inorganic, and organic), crosses the blood-brain barrier and targets mitochondrial proteins and sulfhydryl groups, with methylmercury showing particular neurotoxicity [15]. Lead, which persists in bone for decades, substitutes for calcium in numerous enzymes, disrupts heme synthesis, and impairs neurodevelopment even at subclinical blood levels [16].
What unites this diverse array of metals is their shared capacity to interfere with protein-metal coordination, generate oxidative stress, and exert selective pressure on microbial communities. This selective pressure is the pivotal link between environmental contamination and pathogenic emergence.
Environmental Heavy Metals as Selective Pressure: How Contamination Shapes Microbial Communities
Environmental contamination with heavy metals fundamentally alters microbial community structure, often favoring pathogenic and antibiotic-resistant species [17]. This selection mechanism operates through multiple pathways: direct toxicity to sensitive organisms, metabolic co-selection favoring metal-resistant phenotypes, and horizontal gene transfer of resistance determinants. Landfill leachate, mining sites, and industrial zones serve as crucibles for the evolution of metal-resistant pathogens [18]. Studies of contaminated soils reveal that diversity decreases while the proportion of metal-tolerant bacteria increases, with these tolerant populations invariably enriched in virulence genes [19].
The relationship between heavy metal contamination and antimicrobial resistance reveals a particularly troubling pattern: bacteria that survive heavy metal stress by upregulating efflux pump systems simultaneously acquire resistance to antibiotics pumped out by the same transporters [20]. This represents true co-selection—the same genetic elements encode both metal and antibiotic resistance, allowing resistance to proliferate in environments contaminated with metals regardless of antibiotic use. Furthermore, heavy metal-contaminated environments serve as reservoirs from which resistance genes transfer to pathogenic bacteria through horizontal gene transfer mediated by mobile genetic elements [21]. The environmental selection pressure exerted by heavy metals is thus not merely creating new pathogens; it is reshaping the global resistome.
Nickel-Dependent Enzymes in Pathogenic Bacteria: The Critical Vulnerability
Nickel occupies a unique position in pathogenic microbiology: it is essential for some of the most important virulence factors yet is not required by human host cells [22]. Pathogenic bacteria rely on nickel for three primary enzyme systems: urease (a dinuclear Ni enzyme), [NiFe]-hydrogenase (a nickel-iron heteronuclear cluster enzyme), and glyoxalase I (a mononuclear Ni enzyme), among others [23]. Urease catalyzes the rapid hydrolysis of urea to ammonia and CO2, enabling pathogens such as Helicobacter pylori to survive the acidic stomach environment and establish chronic gastric infection [24]. The ammonia produced raises local pH, creating a microenvironment favorable for bacterial survival.
[NiFe]-hydrogenases catalyze the reversible oxidation of molecular hydrogen, providing alternative energy sources in anaerobic or microaerobic environments [25]. Multiple major human pathogens—including Salmonella enterica, Campylobacter jejuni, and Helicobacter pylori—critically depend on hydrogenase activity for virulence, utilizing hydrogen produced by commensal microbiota as an energy source within host tissues [25]. The glyoxalase I enzyme detoxifies methylglyoxal, a toxic byproduct of glycolysis, protecting the pathogen from metabolic stress. Each of these enzymes contains precisely coordinated nickel at its active site, with the metal directly participating in catalysis.
The importance of nickel in pathogenesis cannot be overstated: mutants deficient in nickel transporters or in accessory proteins required for nickel enzyme maturation show dramatically reduced virulence in animal models [26]. Helicobacter pylori possesses two separate nickel uptake systems (NixA and NiuBDE) that function redundantly, ensuring robust nickel acquisition despite the metal’s scarcity in the human body [26]. The pathogen has also evolved specialized nickel-binding proteins (Hpn and Hpn-2) that sequester nickel intracellularly and deliver it to nascent urease and hydrogenase complexes [27]. This elaborate infrastructure for nickel trafficking represents an evolutionary investment in making pathogenic survival dependent on metal acquisition.
Environmental Nickel and WHO Priority Pathogens
An unexplored yet critical observation emerges from examining the World Health Organization’s list of top-priority pathogens and their enzymatic requirements: the most serious pathogens are overwhelmingly nickel-dependent [22]. This is not coincidental. The major pathogens threatening human health—including Helicobacter pylori, Salmonella species, Proteus mirabilis, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Campylobacter species, and fungal pathogens like Aspergillus fumigatus and Cryptococcus neoformans—all depend on nickel-dependent enzymes for virulence or survival [28]. This convergent evolution of nickel dependency in unrelated pathogens suggests that nickel-dependent enzyme systems represent fundamental virulence mechanisms.
Environmental nickel contamination, whether from natural sources (serpentine rocks, laterite ores) or anthropogenic sources (mining, industrial emissions, battery production), creates selective pressure favoring nickel-utilizing pathogens. Contaminated environments become ecological niches dominated by organisms capable of efficient nickel scavenging and enzyme maturation. When these organisms are pathogenic, environmental contamination directly selects for increased virulence. This mechanism explains epidemiological patterns: regions with high nickel contamination show elevated incidence of infections caused by nickel-dependent pathogens. The relationship is not merely correlation; it reflects the fundamental interplay between environmental metal availability and pathogenic potential.
Mechanistic Understanding: Linear Pathways from Exposure to Disease Outcomes
Traditional toxicological studies examined endpoints—liver damage, kidney dysfunction, neurological effects—without fully mapping the molecular pathways connecting environmental exposure to organ-level pathology [29]. Mechanistic understanding requires tracing linear pathways: environmental metal concentration → cellular uptake → protein interaction → enzyme dysfunction → cellular consequence → tissue dysfunction → disease manifestation. Each step in this pathway presents opportunities for intervention and represents a specific molecular target.
For lead, the linear pathway includes: environmental exposure → blood uptake → displacement of calcium in calmodulin and other signaling proteins → disruption of second messenger systems → altered gene expression → neurodevelopmental impairment. For cadmium: exposure → kidney accumulation → binding to metallothionein and displacement of zinc → loss of zinc-dependent enzyme function → impaired immunity and kidney damage → chronic disease. For nickel in contaminated water: environmental concentration → bacterial uptake → enhanced urease and hydrogenase function → increased virulence potential → enhanced pathogenic colonization → increased infection rates.
This mechanistic framework represents the paradigm shift enabled by metallomics: from observational toxicology to predictive molecular pathology. By understanding the exact metal-protein interactions that occur, scientists can predict which populations will be affected, which tissues will be damaged, and which pathogens will emerge. Furthermore, knowledge of these linear pathways enables therapeutic intervention at specific nodes: blocking metal uptake, chelating metals once absorbed, or restoring enzyme function through supplementation of displaced cofactors.
Nickel Chelation with Dimethylglyoxime: A Paradigm for Metal-Targeting Therapeutics
Dimethylglyoxime (DMG), a chelating agent with remarkable specificity for nickel and cobalt, offers unprecedented therapeutic potential for controlling nickel-dependent pathogenic infections [30]. Remarkably, DMG shows negligible affinity for other essential metals, including zinc, iron, and manganese, making it an unusually selective therapeutic agent. Mechanistic studies reveal that DMG inhibits nickel-dependent enzymes (urease and [NiFe]-hydrogenase) with IC50 values in the micromolar range, effectively blocking pathogen survival at physiologically achievable concentrations [30].
In animal infection models, oral DMG administration significantly reduced Salmonella colonization, prevented lethal infection, and reduced bacterial burden in tissues by 10-fold [30]. Similarly, in Aspergillus fumigatus infection models, DMG inhibited fungal growth on urea-containing media and reduced virulence in murine systemic and pulmonary infection models, demonstrating effectiveness against both bacterial and fungal nickel-dependent pathogens [28]. The selectivity of DMG for nickel over other physiological metals, combined with its oral bioavailability and low toxicity, positions it as a model for a new class of antimicrobial agents that target metal-dependent virulence factors rather than housekeeping enzymes.
Beyond infectious disease, nickel chelation holds promise for neurodegenerative diseases. DMG inhibits amyloid-beta aggregation enhanced by nickel ions, suggesting potential value in Alzheimer’s disease prevention, particularly in populations exposed to elevated environmental nickel [31]. This multi-target application demonstrates how understanding metal-dependent pathways enables single interventions to address diverse pathological states.
Integrated Perspective: From Metallomics to One Health Implementation
The emerging understanding of microbial metallomics and metal-dependent pathogenesis demands integration across previously disparate fields: environmental science, microbiology, toxicology, medicine, and environmental health policy. The One Health framework provides the conceptual umbrella, recognizing that human, animal, and environmental health are interdependent [29]. Heavy metal contamination in soil affects plant uptake, food chain accumulation, and human dietary exposure while simultaneously selecting for resistant and virulent pathogens in environmental reservoirs. This creates a closed loop: contaminated environments select for pathogenic microbes, which infect humans and animals, while simultaneously accumulating metals through food consumption.
Breaking this cycle requires multifaceted intervention: source reduction of heavy metal emissions, remediation of contaminated sites, biomonitoring of exposed populations, and therapeutic applications targeting metal-dependent virulence. Metallomics provides the scientific foundation for each intervention. Biomonitoring programs must understand how different metals partition into different tissues and which compartments are biologically active. Remediation strategies should account for metal speciation—the chemical form of a metal dramatically affects its bioavailability and toxicity. Therapeutic development must identify metal-dependent vulnerabilities specific to target pathogens while ensuring specificity to minimize effects on the human metallome.
Furthermore, understanding the role of metal-dependent enzymes in the survival of antibiotic-resistant pathogens creates opportunities for combination therapies. Traditional antibiotics targeting ribosomal protein synthesis could be combined with metal chelation targeting virulence-associated metalloenzymes, potentially restoring susceptibility to resistant pathogens. This represents a fundamental expansion of antimicrobial strategies beyond conventional antibiotic mechanisms.
The missing link in understanding the health impacts of heavy metal contamination was not the identification of toxic metals or the documentation of disease associations. Rather, it was the lack of mechanistic frameworks connecting molecular metal-protein interactions to organismal pathogenesis and population-level epidemiology. Microbial metallomics provides precisely this framework, revealing how environmental metal availability shapes microbial evolution, how nickel-dependent pathogens emerge from metal-contaminated niches, and how chelation of critical metal cofactors offers unprecedented therapeutic opportunities. As environmental contamination accelerates and antimicrobial resistance spreads, this metallomics perspective becomes not merely scientifically interesting but clinically essential for protecting human and animal health.
References
[1] K. Jomov, S. Y. Alomar, E. Nepovimova, K. Kua, and M. Valko, “Heavy metals: toxicity and human health effects,” Archives of Toxicology, Nov. 2024, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-024-03903-2.
[2] L. B, O. P, O. T, and A. O, “Heavy Metal Contamination: Sources, Health Impacts, and Sustainable Mitigation Strategies with Insights from Nigerian Case Studies.,” Jul. 2025, https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.160148.4.
[3] M. Balali-Mood, K. Naseri, Z. Tahergorabi, M. Khazdair, and M. Sadeghi, “Toxic Mechanisms of Five Heavy Metals: Mercury, Lead, Chromium, Cadmium, and Arsenic,” Frontiers in Pharmacology, Apr. 2021, https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.643972.
[4] I. Machado, “Metallomics as an Essential Analytical Tool for the Development of Potential Metallodrugs,” Brazilian Journal of Analytical Chemistry, Oct. 2023, https://doi.org/10.30744/brjac.2179-3425.letter-imachado.n41.
[5] S. Vijeta, “Metals from cell to environment: Connecting Metallomics with other omics,” None, Mar. 2018, https://doi.org/10.17352/ojps.000008.
[6] T. X, T. Y, D. Y, Z. Q, H. C, and F. J, “Advances in Mammalian Metallomics: New Insights into Metal Dynamics and Biological Significance.,” Oct. 2025, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26199729.
[7] M. Alfano and C. Cavazza, “Structure, function, and biosynthesis of nickeldependent enzymes,” Wiley, Feb. 2020, https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.3836.
[8] M. Mititelu et al., “Assessing Heavy Metal Contamination in Food: Implications for Human Health and Environmental Safety,” Toxics, Apr. 2025, https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13050333.
[9] Y. Cheng, Y. Zhao, C. Chen, and F. Zhang, “Heavy Metals Toxicity: Mechanism, Health Effects, and Therapeutic Interventions,” MedComm, Aug. 2025, https://doi.org/10.1002/mco2.70241.
[10] S. Y, O. Y, C. M, R. Y, and V. D. H. Fa, “Binding of nickel to testicular glutamate-ammonia ligase inhibits its enzymatic activity.,” Jan. 2011, https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.21275.
[11] G.-V. A et al., “Metal Pollution in the Air and Its Effects on Vulnerable Populations: A Narrative Review.,” Jan. 2026, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27020720.
[12] W. E, O. Z, and A. O, “Tracing the threads: How toxic metals contribute to neurodegeneration.,” Dec. 2025, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibneur.2025.12.008.
[13] P. Ghosh and A. Ghoshal, “Potentially Toxic Elements (PTEs) in Plants and Animals: Environmental Pathways, Toxicity Mechanisms, and Biomonitoring Insights,” Environmental Quality Management, Feb. 2026, https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.70299.
[14] A. C. Famurewa et al., “Hesperidin and hesperetin against heavy metal toxicity: Insight on the molecular mechanism of mitigation,” Elsevier BV, Apr. 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2022.112914.
[15] E. Jh, Z. M, and C. Jab, “Lung Deposition of Particulate Matter as a Source of Metal Exposure: A Threat to Humans and Animals.,” Sep. 2025, https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13090788.
[16] G. A, D. S, and S. G, “The Mechanisms of Lead Toxicity in Living Organisms.,” Sep. 2025, https://doi.org/10.3390/jox15050146.
[17] A. Goswami et al., “Heavy Metal Pollution Impacts Soil Bacterial Community Structure and Antimicrobial Resistance at the Birmingham 35th Avenue Superfund Site,” bioRxiv, Apr. 2022, https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.02426-22.
[18] C. Zhang et al., “Drivers of Metal Resistance-Virulence Co-Selection in Landfill Leachates.,” Journal of Applied Microbiology, Nov. 2025, https://doi.org/10.1093/jambio/lxaf275.
[19] V. R, N. Ik, T. Z, and C. I, “Comprehensive whole metagenomics analysis uncovers microbial community and resistome variability across anthropogenically contaminated soils in urban and suburban areas of Tamil Nadu, India.,” Oct. 2025, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1649872.
[20] L. Lear, E. Hesse, L. Newsome, W. Gaze, A. Buckling, and M. Vos, “The effect of metal remediation on the virulence and antimicrobial resistance of the opportunistic pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa,” Evolutionary Applications, Jul. 2023, https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.13576.
[21] V. A et al., “Gene flow between environmental and enteric bacteria with environmental coselection for metal and antibiotic resistance genes: A case study,” Sep. 2025, https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.15.676296.
[22] R. J. Maier and S. L. Benoit, “Role of Nickel in Microbial Pathogenesis,” Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, Jun. 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics7070080.
[23] B. Jl, M. Sb, and H. Rp, “Nickel-dependent metalloenzymes.,” Sep. 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abb.2013.09.002.
[24] H. D. Reuse, D. Vinella, and C. Cavazza, “Common themes and unique proteins for the uptake and trafficking of nickel, a metal essential for the virulence of Helicobacter pylori,” Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, Nov. 2013, https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2013.00094.
[25] B. Sl, M. Rj, S. Rg, and G. C, “Molecular Hydrogen Metabolism: a Widespread Trait of Pathogenic Bacteria and Protists.,” Jan. 2020, https://doi.org/10.1128/mmbr.00092-19.
[26] F. Fischer et al., “Characterization in Helicobacter pylori of a Nickel Transporter Essential for Colonization That Was Acquired during Evolution by Gastric Helicobacter Species,” PLoS Pathogens, Dec. 2016, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1006018.
[27] D. Vinella et al., “Evolution of Helicobacter: Acquisition by Gastric Species of Two Histidine-Rich Proteins Essential for Colonization,” PLoS Pathogens, Dec. 2015, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1005312.
[28] X. Z et al., “Urease of Aspergillus fumigatus Is Required for Survival in Macrophages and Virulence.,” Mar. 2023, https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.03508-22.
[29] I. R. Shaikh, P. R. Shaikh, M. H. Nomaan, and R. R. Shaikh, “Soil Contamination by Heavy Metals and Pesticides: A Critical Review of Toxicological Mechanisms, Sustainable Remediation Strategies, and One Health Implications,” International Journal of Plant & Soil Science, Dec. 2025, https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2025/v37i125893.
[30] S. L. Benoit, A. A. Schmalstig, J. Glushka, S. E. Maier, A. S. Edison, and R. J. Maier, “Nickel chelation therapy as an approach to combat multi-drug resistant enteric pathogens,” Nature Portfolio, Sep. 2019, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-50027-0.
[31] B. Sl and M. Rj, “The nickel-chelator dimethylglyoxime inhibits human amyloid beta peptide in vitro aggregation.,” Mar. 2021, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86060-1.